Bryce Nakashima vs Anton Shepp Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L L W W L
Form
W L W L L W W W L LH2H: Nakashima 1 - 0 Shepp
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nakashima winning 2 and Shepp winning 0. The last match between Nakashima and Shepp was at the M15 San Diego, 04-06-2024, Q3, Hard with Bryce Nakashima getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Bryce Nakashima | 1 |
| Anton Shepp | 0 |
M15 San Diego(04-06-2024)
6
3
6
3
| Nakashima | Stats | Shepp |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 21 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 51% (37-35) | Career Total W/L | 57% (17-13) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cobolli VS Rune PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fonseca VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bryce Nakashima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Derek Pham
Player
Bryce Nakashima
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bryce Nakashima
Player
Radu Mihai Papoe
52%
(
44 of
84)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bryce Nakashima
Player
Ryan Haviland
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
10
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
9
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Bryce Nakashima
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Bryce Nakashima
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bryce Nakashima
Player
Emon Van Loben Sels
66%
(
76 of
115)
1st Serve %
56%
(
59 of
106)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
115
Total Points Won
106
|
5-7 7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 4-6 12-10 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Anton Shepp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sam Ryan Ziegann
Player
Anton Shepp
55%
(
48 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
69%
(
27 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Loutit
Player
Anton Shepp
43%
(
20 of
46)
1st Serve %
57%
(
21 of
37)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anton Shepp
Player
Finley Hall
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
47%
(
42 of
90)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
15
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 1-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anton Shepp
Player
Lev Gorb
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Anton Shepp
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
7
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 7-6(2) 19-17 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Vito Tonejc
Player
Anton Shepp
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
9
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
6-0 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anton Shepp
Player
Cash Hanzlik
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51% (37/35) | Win/Loss | 57% (17/13) |
| 52% (83/77) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (40/32) |
| 52% (816/745) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (374/356) |
| 52% (28/26) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (17/13) |
| 60% (3/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (6/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 114 | Aces Total | 69 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 98 | Total Double Faults | 55 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:6:49 |
| 326.82 | Average Opponent Rank | 300.37 |
| 57% (1249/2175) | 1st Serve % | 64% (821/1278) |
| 69% (857/1249) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (534/821) |
| 48% (448/926) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (212/457) |
| 40% (64/159) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (47/142) |
| 36% (752/2084) | Return Points Win % | 38% (501/1305) |
| 0% (0/2) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 53% (37/33) | Futures W/L | 59% (17/12) |
| 51% (37/72) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (17/30) |
| 44% (8/18) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 44% (7/16) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (6/12) |
| 92% (36/33) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (18/15) |
| 8% (36/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (18/3) |
| 11% (36/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (12/2) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
